Forward

By DataAnalytics

“Forward”
Merriam-Webster’s Definition of FORWARD:

1a : near, being at, or belonging to the forepart b : situated in advance

2a : strongly inclined : ready b : lacking modesty or reserve : brash

3: notably advanced or developed : precocious

4: moving, tending, or leading toward a position in front; also : moving toward an opponent’s goal

5a : advocating an advanced policy in the direction of what is considered progress b : extreme, radical

6: of, relating to, or getting ready for the future <forward buying of produce>
— for·ward·ly adverb
— for·ward·ness noun

Looking closely at definition number 5a, its meaning becomes particular interesting in certain contexts and uses of the word- Forward.

For example one could easily sight the apparent radical financial actions of the U.S. government
and its agencies over the past 12 to 13 years that had been steadily gaining momentum and now, rapidly accelerating during this particular administration.

As well as the extreme ideologies of both the republican and democratic parties, which has manifested itself in the form of massive and unchecked corporate pandering and financial welfare being handed out to large investment banks, large corporations, along with the continuing erosion of personal freedoms of the American citizen. As they had (the U.S. government) stated, their goal was to “fundamentally transform America” and indeed, seem to have succeeded.

Definition 6, states; -get ready for the future, and in the case of the U.S. economy and the
immediate and mid-term future, it speaks more to the ‘get ready’ verbiage described. What it
does imply, is that the majority of United States citizens should be ‘getting ready’ for a future of a depressed economy, enormous fiscal/capital debt and monetary inflation, that well may last for a decade or possibly longer.

Now that we have established the various definitions of Forward, let’s examine the roots of the slogan “Forward” as a bureaucratic advertising catch-phrase.

The use of the word in the political realm is nothing new. In fact it dates back to the late 1800’s in the former Social Democratic Party of Germany. (which was an early Marxist-Based party platform)

Forward, or the German version, Vorwärts! Was a  daily newspaper published originally in Leipzig from 1876 to 1878 and then again in Berlin from 1891 to 1933. Vorwärts! was the voice of the European Marxist-Socialist movement and ideology, before being outlawed and crushed by the so-called Fascists of the Nazi Party (also a Socialist ideology itself, just that it was a Right-Wing movement rather than a Left-Wing movement)

Subsequently, during the reign of Nazi totalitarianism, Vorwärts! Vorwärts! (Forward! Forward!) was the Hitler-Youth marching song designed to rally and unite the German people with national fervor from the emerging youth.


Forward, was also utilized by the Soviet’s in the early 1900’s.  Translated from its Russian Marxist-Socialist political use, the term Vperedwas the first Bolshevik weekly newspaper, published in Geneva from Dec. 22, 1904 to May 5, 1905.

The name of the newspaper was suggested by then future Soviet leader, Vladimir Lenin.
Vpered was also a radical and extreme Marxist organization within the Russian Social Democratic Party, from 1909 – 1912. The slogan and context of Forward in political propaganda terms was also heavily touted and used in the Post WWII GDR/DDR and Soviet Union.

In more modern times, the European and North American Socialists define Forward
as “The way forward for anti-capitalism.” The caveat though, is that the U.S. government is not outwardly anti-capitalist, but they are without question, pro-corporatist. On the surface it would
seem that they are champions of free-markets, but when you dig deep enough below that surface
the evidence reveals a completely different and alarming truth.

In essence, a Corporatist platform of capitalism, is really nothing more than a form of Market-Socialism. When one considers what the government has done with tax-payer money or ‘printed’ currency, to “Bail-Out” dozens upon dozens of supposedly free-market owned companies.

The list is lengthy to print, but anyone who is able to search the internet thoroughly, can find the long list of companies and corporations the U.S. government has ‘loaned’ tax-payer money to. Although these so-called loans were nothing more than ownership stakes in said entities.  Thereby creating partially and loosely owned/controlled economies- which is one of the tenets of Market Socialism.

We will continue our look and discussion of Forward in Part II

Advertisements

Soaring Fuel Prices Hit Americans Hard

Guest Post:
By Nick Barile

If you’ve glanced at the big numbers on top of the gasoline pump recently, you’ve undoubtedly noticed the slow, dreadful escalation of fuel prices.  The majority of Americans are now paying close to $4.00 per gallon of gasoline, which has threatened the economic recovery and pushed many families closer to the brink. Why? Because, like it or not, our world runs on sweet crude oil.

Everything you buy, eat, or interact with is in existence because of oil. Your groceries, your school commute, your laptop- even this article that you’re reading right now- all have a relationship with oil that’s not going to end well. It’s important to understand why fuel prices are so high, and what you- and our country- should do to combat them.

Oil, natural gas, and other commodities’ prices reflect the speculation of investors based on the current environment. Almost all consumables are based on the centuries-old theory of supply and demand. If America is on the road-trip to recovery, then she’s going to have to fill the tank more than sitting idly in the depths of the Recession.

It seems that along with our own economic expansion, we have witnessed a dramatic uptick in the world’s consumption of oil. China and India have been rapidly expanding economically, and population growth has resulted in more vehicles being on the road than ever before.

The instability of the Middle East has also been the culprit for the theft of more American dollars. Revolutions of the Arab Spring have caused fear of a supply disruption, which would bring back the gas shortages of the 1970’s. Even more so, the United States’ increasingly hawkish foreign policy with Iran has led investors to become wary of yet another war fought within sight of oil wells, further causing fear of a drop in supply.

But our government isn’t doing that well in easing tensions. Our continued presence in the Middle East has led to many outbreaks of violence, stressing any political stability to be had. And the Obama Administration’s belligerence towards Iran has caused many near-panics for speculators, as Iran has retaliated with threats to stem the flow of oil out of the Middle East.

Our current policy is the equivalent of throwing water on a grease fire. It may seem the correct thing to do, but in reality, all it does is further spread the flames and result in more problems. If the United States wants to truly prevent political instability, then the government needs to dramatically re-think the interventionist foreign policy it has maintained for the past decade.

Even so, there are countless things to be done at home in order to hopefully quell gas prices’ jumpiness.  The first is a relatively obvious answer: more domestic production. Few will deny the risks of oil exploration. There have been catastrophes, no doubt, but we are on the verge of an economic one if Americans see gas prices upwards of $5 a gallon (not a far-fetched thought at all, as gas prices in Europe hover around $9 per gallon).

Although many advocate higher efficiency standards, it’s important to consider the feasibility of such requirements. The Chevrolet Volt, for instance, a poster-boy for President’s push for alternative energy, has been a spectacular marketing failure because of its price and ROI factor.

Consumers will simply not pay ridiculous sums of money for a car just to lower annual gasoline bills- that would take 27 years to recoup the investment. Even though Europe is a horrible example to follow in terms of production, they have been able to raise their efficiency by using two things: diesel fuel and small scooters/”Vespas”.

Diesel provides for much better fuel economy than its counterpart (capable of hitting near 50 MPG on the highway), and most gas-powered mopeds/scooters can achieve near 100 miles to the gallon. If America were to adapt itself to these things, gas consumption would fall dramatically than our current plans of driving 8 cylinder SUVs to work.

 


While we generally agree with Nick’s pov, we here at DataAnalytics

disagree with a few key points the author made.

Demand for gasoline the U.S. is at a 17 year low, while Europe is at a
decade low. Which more than off-sets the increases in China and India.

Also, the False Inflection points that are utilized by the traders are convenient ‘triggers’ that enable them to raise the prices without any accountability or real proof. The Iranian ‘issues’ were all media and government created, in order to allow the street to drive the prices up during that supposed ‘tense’ period.

Middle-East tensions with regard to oil supply has been something the
market has had to deal with for about 40 years, this is not something new.
But because the media and the government made so much noise about it,
it in turn gave the green-light to speculators, to panic investors and drive
up the Nymex/Cushing contract prices under false pretenses.

DataAnalytics findings reveal that Speculation accounts for approximately (+/-)28% of the price of a barrel of Brent Crude. NOT the 15% the St. Louis Fed came up with. Kevin G. Hall, of McClatchy states, “Oil and gas prices were soaring thanks again in no small part to rampant financial speculation on top of (exaggerated) fears of supply disruptions.”

Hall’s March report highlights the fact that despite rising prices at U.S. gas pumps, demand in the U.S. was so low it has “become a net exporter of gasoline, unable to consume all that it generates.”

We also believe that Europe is not a ‘horrible’ example of production, as
Europe’s GDP is not much different than the U.S.’s over the past4 years.
We also would really like to see the U.S. government and State governments seriously adapt alternative transportation methods, such as bicycles and scooters much more widely than it is. Our roads and highways are in general, not bicycle/scooter friendly at all. Especially on the east and west metro coast areas.

Collusion between Government and Corporate Banks

By DataAnalytics - (Video via Bill Moyers Show)

“There’s no clearer example of the collusion between government
and finance than the deal that created Citigroup in the first place.”


Bill Moyers talks with former Citigroup Chairman John Reed to explore
how the mid-90’s merger of Citicorp and Travelers Group – and a friendly
Presidential pen (one Bill Clinton), brought down the Glass-Steagall Act.

While there were many people of power and influence involved, there
were three main players who were key in enabling the death of Glass-Steagall
were Fed Chairman, Alan Greenspan, Republican Senator, Phil Gramm
and Democratic Secretary of the Treasury, Robert Rubin.
(who was also former co-chair of Goldman Sachs)

All were heavily ‘pressed’ (and probably compensated) by Sandy Weill, head of
the investment bank and insurance company Travelers Group.
(Travelers merged with Citibank to form Citigroup)

In the prior weeks leading up to the repeal of Glass-Steagall, Rubin resigned his
government post to join Citigroup’s board, the very financial giant made possible
by the subsequent Glass-Steagall Act’s elimination.

While the darling of the media and the left-wing, former president Bill Clinton,
willingly and knowingly signed the bill eliminating Glass-Steagall. On the
April 1998 night before the signing, Weill stated:
“The President (Clinton) was in fact told last evening about what was going to happen.”

So, those who think or refuse to believe that Clinton was unaware or had no part
in the what was to be the creation of “Too Big to Fail” are dead wrong or just plain ignorant.

Among the legislation’s many detractors, was Senator, Byron Dorgan.
“We are with this piece of legislation moving towards greater risk.
We are almost certainly moving towards substantial new concentration
and mergers in the financial services industry, that is almost certainly not
in the interest of consumers.”

Senator Dorgan stated that in ten years we will look back and regret what was
enacted and sure enough in 2008, exactly ten years later, he was dead-on right.

What is without a doubt most apparent, is the full cooperation and collusion between
major players in BOTH political parties. As we have been stating for years, the majority of Republicans and Democrats are corrupt, deceitful and only looking to advance their
careers and fatten their wallets on the backs of the American tax paying public.
It’s time to start voting for alternative parties, period.

Read the full transcript here

Crony Capitalism or Corporatism by any other name…

Via Bill Moyers


Moyers & Company
explores the tight connection between Wall Street
and the White House with David Stockman, former budget director
for President Reagan.

Stockman speaks candidly with Moyers about how money dominates
politics, distorting free markets and endangering democracy.
“As a result,” Stockman says, “we have neither capitalism nor democracy.
We have crony capitalism.” Or Corporatism.

 

FANNIE & FREDDIE SOUGHT $95 BILLION DOLLARS FROM U.S. TAX PAYERS IN 2009

Guest Post:
By Die ex-onomic Machina

The U.S. housing market continues to slide in one of the darkest abysses in the nations history. New home sales have plummeted, existing home sales posted a record low in January as well. Home prices are dropping like a rock from the sky and foreclosures are running wild. While shadow inventory is set to flood the market this year, producing a bigger glut of unsold homes, which will drive sale price and volume even lower.

Now Fannie Mae, the largest mortgage provider in the U.S. has reported enormous losses topping $74 Billion Dollars for 2009.  Earlier in the week, Freddie Mac posted a $21.6 billion loss for 2009. Combined, that is a MASSIVE $95 BILLION DOLLARS lost from both government sponsored institutions. $95 Billion in tax payer  monies WASTED and SQUANDERED by corrupt, thieving politicians and suits running these two fraudulent entities.

Fannie Mae spokesperson said they will seek an ADDITIONAL $15.3 Billion in additional funds from the U.S. government this year. The firm has already received $59.9 billion in aid from the so-called stimulus. When you total the amount of tax payer money GIVEN to both publicly funded institutions, it is a STAGGERING $170 BILLION DOLLARS. That’s $170 Billion STOLEN from the American tax payers by Fannie and Freddie alone. How about the Billions more given to all the BANKS who have also stolen tax payer money- via TARP and stimulus? The auto makers? And other many various companies and entities as well.

How many BILLIONS upon BILLIONS are we, the American Tax Payers in debited for? How much more are we going stand for? How much longer before the public stops voting for these same CRIMINALS in BOTH parties- who KEEP stealing OUR money and LYING to us. Where is the conservative movement, at a time when America truly needs it?

The corruption and financial problems with Freddie and Fannie are just the tip of the iceberg. Isn’t it interesting that NO ONE in the socialist mainstream media has done any type of investigative reporting on the suicide of Freddie chief financial officer David B. Kellermann, in April of 2009. Why is that? The cover up behind the real story must be mind blowing. The layers and layers of corruption that are waiting to be uncovered must be staggering. But, has anyone in the Obama run media bothered to vet out the real story? No. Instead, the State-run media falls inline and follows orders, the new order from comrade change and his socialist minions.

Barney Frank, Chris Dodd and host of other criminal executives and politicians are so deeply embedded in corruption with these two institutions and yet no one seems to care. When will be the time to care? Will it be after the left-leaning U.S. government installs State-Run Health Care? Will it be when the jobless rate reaches 20%? Again, where is the conservative movement at a time when America truly needs it.

What happened to the American values of hard work and self-sustainability? What happened to the America from the 1940′s through the 1950′s? A time when our country was at its BEST, with a strong, proud work ethic, solid family values and the staunch will to further democracy? It seems to be gone for now, taken away by the dangerous progressive liberal socialists, the minority groups of the very, very wealthy, the very poor, the corrupt unions, and all of the special interest groups who DO NOT represent the majority of America. -Taken by the brain-washed who believe that a platform of European styled Socialism is the right path for our Nation. Tragically, they are hugely and deadly mistaken.